-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 225
Add laser model description to docs #5397
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add laser model description to docs #5397
Conversation
cff45ec to
5f2592c
Compare
chillenzer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor typos.
chillenzer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, wrong button. But it's very quick fixes.
|
@steindev what is the status of this PR? |
PrometheusPi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor questions
|
Updates? |
|
@steindev what is the status of this PR? |
|
Work in progress. Might come back to it this or next week. |
|
Poke |
72f7b11 to
4caaf07
Compare
|
@PrometheusPi @chillenzer @BeyondEspresso @finnolec Ready for review! |
PrometheusPi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only minor suggestions - rendered doc page looks good.
docs/source/models/lasers.rst
Outdated
| \mathrm e^{\imath\frac{1}{2}\arctan\frac{z}{z_{\mathrm R,y}}} | ||
| \mathrm e^{-\imath \frac{y^2 R_y^{-1}(z)}{2c}\frac{1}{\tau_0}\Omega^\prime} | ||
|
|
||
| only the last exponential depends on frequency :math:`\Omega^\prime` and needs to be taken into account in the Fourier transform. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is "exponential" here correct or "exponent"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
|
What's the status here? Occasional green reviews and then updates again? |
|
Poke! |
|
Poke @steindev |
|
Setting this to draft to not further distract reviewers, @steindev |
Co-authored-by: Richard Pausch <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: chillenzer <[email protected]>
ca34f4b to
f9f6985
Compare
|
I assumed you implemented all requested changes @steindev and thus I set the status to "ready for review". If this is not the case, please revert to "draft mode" |
|
As an early Christmas present to all the people involved here, I will now -- after almost half a year -- merge this simple update of the docs! 🎉 |
756d421
into
ComputationalRadiationPhysics:dev
PR adds analytic formulas, which are the basis of the implementation of the
GaussianPulseandDispersivePulse, to the docs.I see this as a first version. Feedback is welcome!